Match Details
Preview
Head To Head
| Date | Details | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5/10/26 |
|
HALIFAX HOOPERS | 136 | - | 94 | PORT CITY POWER |
|
| 5/2/26 |
|
PORT CITY POWER | 108 | - | 111 | HALIFAX HOOPERS |
|
| 4/24/26 |
|
HALIFAX HOOPERS | 125 | - | 100 | PORT CITY POWER |
|
| 4/2/26 |
|
PORT CITY POWER | 102 | - | 92 | HALIFAX HOOPERS |
|
| 3/25/26 |
|
PORT CITY POWER | 124 | - | 122 | HALIFAX HOOPERS |
|
- Recent Results
| Date | Opposition | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 5/15/26 |
NEWFOUNDLAND ROGUES
(A)
| L 106-129 |
| 5/14/26 |
NEWFOUNDLAND ROGUES
(A)
| L 103-110 |
| 5/10/26 |
PORT CITY POWER
(H)
| W 136-94 |
| 5/8/26 |
TRI CITY TIDE
(H)
| L 96-110 |
| 5/2/26 |
PORT CITY POWER
(A)
| W 111-108 |
- Recent Results
| Date | Opposition | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 5/15/26 |
TRI CITY TIDE
(A)
|
L 97-107 |
| 5/10/26 |
HALIFAX HOOPERS
(A)
|
L 94-136 |
| 5/9/26 |
TRI CITY TIDE
(H)
|
L 84-106 |
| 5/6/26 |
NEWFOUNDLAND ROGUES
(A)
|
W 94-93 |
| 5/5/26 |
NEWFOUNDLAND ROGUES
(A)
|
L 97-106 |
Team Leaders
Average points
| 1. |
A. Davis
|
22.0 |
| 2. |
A. Ottley
|
20.7 |
| 3. |
I. Ankrah
|
17.4 |
| 4. |
T. Hogg
|
15.2 |
| 5. |
A. Stanford
|
15.1 |
Average assists
| 1. |
I. Ankrah
|
5.4 |
| 2. |
A. Davis
|
4.0 |
| 3. |
A. Ottley
|
2.4 |
| 4. |
T. Scott
|
2.2 |
| 5. |
A. Stanford
|
2.1 |
Average defensive rebounds
Average offensive rebounds
| 1. |
A. Stanford
|
2.6 |
| 2. |
T. Hogg
|
2.0 |
| 3. |
A. Ottley
|
2.0 |
| 4. |
I. Ankrah
|
1.8 |
| 5. |
D. smith
|
1.4 |
Team Comparisons
HFH PCP
2 Points percentage
50.6
49.9
Field goal percentage
46.4
43.1
3 Point percentage
34.7
33.0
Free throw percentage
74.7
70.2
Standings
| Position | Team | GP | W | L | %won | L5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  |
4 BEARS ROAR | 20 | 19 | 1 | 95 | W W W W W |
| 2 |  |
GREAT FALLS ELECTRIC | 20 | 14 | 6 | 70 | W L W W W |
| 3 |  |
GRANT COUNTY REDTAILS | 18 | 12 | 6 | 66 | L W W W W |
| 4 |  |
TRI-CITIES SUN DEVILS | 15 | 2 | 11 | 13 | L L L L L |
| 5 |  |
WILLAMETTE VALLEY JAGUARS | 15 | 2 | 13 | 13 | L L L L L |