Match Details
Preview
Head To Head
| Date | Details | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5/10/26 |
|
HALIFAX HOOPERS | 136 | - | 94 | PORT CITY POWER |
|
| 5/2/26 |
|
PORT CITY POWER | 108 | - | 111 | HALIFAX HOOPERS |
|
| 4/24/26 |
|
HALIFAX HOOPERS | 125 | - | 100 | PORT CITY POWER |
|
| 4/2/26 |
|
PORT CITY POWER | 102 | - | 92 | HALIFAX HOOPERS |
|
| 3/25/26 |
|
PORT CITY POWER | 124 | - | 122 | HALIFAX HOOPERS |
|
- Recent Results
| Date | Opposition | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 5/22/26 |
TRI CITY TIDE
(H)
| L 98-107 |
| 5/15/26 |
NEWFOUNDLAND ROGUES
(A)
| L 106-129 |
| 5/14/26 |
NEWFOUNDLAND ROGUES
(A)
| L 103-110 |
| 5/10/26 |
PORT CITY POWER
(H)
| W 136-94 |
| 5/8/26 |
TRI CITY TIDE
(H)
| L 96-110 |
- Recent Results
| Date | Opposition | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 5/18/26 |
TRI CITY TIDE
(H)
|
L 106-108 |
| 5/15/26 |
TRI CITY TIDE
(A)
|
L 97-107 |
| 5/10/26 |
HALIFAX HOOPERS
(A)
|
L 94-136 |
| 5/9/26 |
TRI CITY TIDE
(H)
|
L 84-106 |
| 5/6/26 |
NEWFOUNDLAND ROGUES
(A)
|
W 94-93 |
Team Leaders
Average points
| 1. |
A. Davis
|
21.8 |
| 2. |
A. Ottley
|
20.3 |
| 3. |
I. Ankrah
|
17.4 |
| 4. |
A. Stanford
|
14.9 |
| 5. |
T. Hogg
|
14.8 |
Average assists
| 1. |
I. Ankrah
|
5.3 |
| 2. |
A. Davis
|
4.1 |
| 3. |
A. Ottley
|
2.3 |
| 4. |
A. Stanford
|
2.2 |
| 5. |
T. Scott
|
2.1 |
Average defensive rebounds
Average offensive rebounds
| 1. |
A. Stanford
|
2.5 |
| 2. |
A. Ottley
|
2.0 |
| 3. |
T. Hogg
|
2.0 |
| 4. |
I. Ankrah
|
1.8 |
| 5. |
D. smith
|
1.6 |
Team Comparisons
HFH PCP
2 Points percentage
50.3
49.4
Field goal percentage
45.8
42.9
3 Point percentage
34.2
33.2
Free throw percentage
74.3
70.9
Standings
| Position | Team | GP | W | L | %won | L5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  |
DC HEAT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1 |  |
KISSIMMEE LAMBS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1 |  |
RALEIGH FIREBIRDS | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1 | |
TRI CITY TIDE | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |